Court Rules PCR Test Not Suitable For COVID-19 Diagnosis – Lockdowns Has No Legal Basis

Following the Portuguese, German and Dutch rulings, now the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.

The court stated on the basis of scientific studies that the grounds for the prohibition put forward by the Vienna State Police Department are completely unfounded. In particular, the criteria and definitions used to determine the number of corona infections are being massively questioned. It is expressly pointed out that, even according to the World Health Organization (which took a u-turn only after Biden took office), “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”. A Portuguese appeals court has also ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test. In Germany a court in a landmark ruling has declared that COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by the government are unconstitutional.

It is reported that the German Interior Ministry hired scientists to develop fake coronavirus model in order to justify strict lockdown, according to extensive email exchanges obtained by a group of lawyers in a legal dispute. In Norway communication that could have revealed such illegal activities strangely has been deleted. An American federal judge ruled coronavirus restrictions in Pennsylvania as unconstitutional. Even the Hague Court has ruled that the COVID-19 lockdown which was imposed by the Dutch Govt had no legal basis and that it was illegal.


You May Also Like

One thought on “Court Rules PCR Test Not Suitable For COVID-19 Diagnosis – Lockdowns Has No Legal Basis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *